Princess
 
Home
4C's and Beyond
Diamonds
Contact Us
About Us
Settings
Jewelry

 

0.72ct F VS2 Princess
0.73ct H VS1 Princess
0.74ct EVVS2 Princess
0.77ct ESI1 Princess
0.78ct I VS1 Princess
0.82ct D VVS1 Princess
0.83ct H VS1 Princess
0.91ct G VS2 Princess
0.92ct G VVS2 Princess
0.92ct H VS1 Princess
0.93ct J VVS1 Princess
0.98ct F VVS2 Princess
1.01ct G VVS1 Princess
1.01ct G VVS1 Princess
1.02ct E VS2 Princess
1.02ct G VS1 Princess
1.03ct G VS1 Princess
1.04ct G VVS1 Princess
1.04ct I SI1 Princess
1.06ct J VS1 Princess
1.07ct I VS1 Princess
1.08ct I VS2 Princess
1.11ct G VVS2 Princess
1.17ct EVS1 Princess
1.83ct F VVS2 Princess
1.85ct  GVVS2 Princess
2.04ct E VS1 Princess
2.04ct G VS2 Princess
2.24ct G VS2 Princess
3.05ct HVS1 Princess

The Princess Cut Diaries

(How to select the most beautiful Princess Cuts)
by Jonathan Weingarten (aka Rhino)

    For those of you who have spent time browsing the diamonds we feature you'll know that we just don't post or purchase for inventory the common types of stones that are sold in most stores or websites.  Our aim is to select the most aesthetically beautiful stones utilizing the latest and best technologies for the task as we can ascertain and separate the most brilliant princess cuts from the least.  The #1 question we get asked most frequently is ... "What proportions constitute an "Ideal" princess cut?  Thankfully AGS has undertaken the task and very recently (as of May 1st 2005) starting issuing lab reports on princess cuts and have designated an "ideal" grade which is very hard to attain.  Most factories cutting princess cuts do not send their goods to AGS for the most part so those that have the gumption to do so must be very confident in what they are cutting.  We'll see how this plays out.

    While the expression "Ideal" just started being applied to certain princess cuts (only from AGS) this tutorial is being written during a major transition that is taking place within our trade.  Both GIA and AGS Labs are completely revamping their cut grading systems and AGS' first implementation with this new cut grading system will, of all shapes, be applied firstly to princess cuts (effective May 1st 2005).  When this system is released we will be updating this tutorial as necessary and comparing the results of their studies with that of our own.  So far, the limited information that has been given to us from AGS shows a nice correlation between what we have found and what they have found. At this point it appears that we are very much on the same page.

We'll be breaking down this tutorial into a number of chapters.  The first 2 which are included on this page.  In the upcoming weeks we'll be adding the others.

  • How we go about finding the most brilliant princess cuts.
  • The case of the table being smaller than total depth.
  • The case of the table being greater than total depth.
  • How to determine if a Princess cut has AGS ideal proportions.
  • Princess cuts and optical symmetry.

Where to begin?

Well ... lets start with the current market situation.  Since there is currently no standard definition for what constitutes "ideal" for princess cuts, cutting houses are generally guided by one philosophy which dominates throughout most cutting houses.  Get the most yielded weight from the rough as possible with little or minimum regards for proportions that will produce high brilliance.  The result?  Generally stones with total depths or tables that are in the high 70's to low 80% range resulting in either bottom heavy or top heavy stones with shallow crowns.  Either of which produce brilliance and light return that 99% of the time is less than ideal. :(

A current search from one of our wholesale databases produces the following results...

  

Shp Size  Col Clar  Rpt Dpth Tbl Girdle  Cul Pol Sym  Flr  Measurements  Ratio 
PR  1.00  VS1  EGL  89.1  64  M-V.TK   NO  5.41*4.93*4.39  1.10:1.00 
PR  1.00  VS1  EGL  81.2  -           5.76*4.99*4.05  1.15:1.00 
PR  1.00  VS1  EGL  70.3  -           6.22*5.38*3.78  1.16:1.00 
PR  1.00  VS1  EGL  69.3  86  TN-M POL      
PR  1.00  VS1  EGL  75.2  81  TN-S.TK   5.45*5.36*4.03  1.02:1.00 
PR  1.00  VS1  EGL  74.3  72  TN-S.TK   5.48*5.36*4.07  1.02:1.00 
PR  1.00  VS1  EGL  83.5  75  MD-TK   5.53 * 5.02 * 4.19  1.10:1.00 
PR  1.00  VS1  EGL  74.9  68  -   VG  5.52*5.17*3.87  1.07:1.00 
PR  1.00  VS1  EGL  79.5  75  MDP   VG  VG  5.48*5.13*4.08  1.07:1.00 
PR  1.00  VS1  EGL  82.3  79  MDP   VG  VG  5.25*5.19*4.27  1.01:1.00 
PR  1.00  VS1  EGL     -           6.16*5.21*3.81  1.18:1.00 
PR  1.00  VS1  EGL      -           5.11*5.01*4.26  1.02:1.00 
PR  1.00  VS1  EGL  79.4  67  TK   5.50* 5.00* 3.97  1.10:1.00 
PR  1.00  VS1  EGL  76.1  76  -   5.22*5.22*3.97  1.00:1.00 
PR  1.00  VS1  EGL 63.5  76  -   5.54*5.53*3.51  1.00:1.00 
PR  1.00  VS1  EGL  86.5  68  -   5.13*4.96*4.29  1.03:1.00 
PR  1.00  VS1  EGL  63.1  74  M   5.66*5.63*3.55  1.01:1.00 
PR  1.00  VS1  EGL  73.1  75  THN   GD  GV  MB  5.64*5.38*3.93  1.05:1.00 
PR  1.00  VS1  EGL  78.1  71  M   VG  VG  5.36*5.30*4.14  1.01:1.00 
PR  1.00  VS1  EGL  76.8  73  -     5.3*5.18*3.98  1.02:1.00 
PR  1.00  VS1  EGL  72.9  74  TKP   VG  VG  5.68*5.5*4.01  1.03:1.00 
PR  1.00  VS1  EGL      -           5.46*5.10*3.98  1.07:1.00 
PR  1.00  VS1